Home

Figure 21. According to Sinclair and Valdimarsson (2003), adding “ecosystem considerations to present fishery
management system methods can be done gradually, some changes are called for:

 

  • “Instead of addressing a definite fish stock solely, the whole ecosystem and its components will have to be included in the consideration. This may well start with some factors only, reflecting the availability of data.
  • Definition of management objectives will be broader, without losing sight of those of particular short-term interest to the fisheries sector.
  • The number of reference points and indicators will increase, (e.g. size compositions or average trophic level of catch), and hence the need to widen the scientific base for management decisions.
  • Monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS) systems will have to be strengthened, with inevitability higher costs.
  • Institutional arrangements will have to be strengthened and broadened to include non-fishery stakeholders and allow consultations with all legitimate interested parties concerning management objectives as well as management measures, although those from the fishery sector, including the fisherfolk themselves, will continue to be the nucleus.
  • Stakeholder engagement should be promoted through training and public awareness programs.
  • A considerable extra effort in research will be required, not only for verifying indicators and reference points, but also on the economic and social implications of ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM), including factors such as the equitable sharing of costs and benefits between stakeholders (and by addressing any overcapacity and fishing effort problems).
  • A visible leap ahead is needed to assisting developing countries to increase their capacity to introduce this wider fishery management concept into their fisheries.”

Further, to achieve optimal management best practices an effort to reduce uncertainties is important to promote relevant research on ecosystem subjects such as:

  • “considering improved methods for consultation and joint decision making so as to improve ecosystem governance;
  • ensuring all critical habitats for the key species in the ecosystem are located and mapped, and identifying and addressing any threats;
  • improving knowledge of the food webs, including prey and predator relationships, to facilitate consideration of possible ecosystem responses to different management actions;
  • improving the monitoring of by-catch and discards in all fisheries to obtain a better knowledge of the amount of catch actually taken; and
  • studying any threats to the marine ecosystems from human sources outside fisheries, whether land-based or marine, and investigating means to minimize these.”

www.nefsc.noaa.gov
Search
Link Disclaimer
webMASTER
Privacy Policy
(Modified Jun. 13 2008)