Home

Table 5.7. Effects of otter trawls on mixed substrate habitat: summary of published studies. (S = statistically significant; citations in bold print are peer-reviewed publications.)

No. Reference Location Depth Sediment Effects Recovery Approach
1 DFO 1993 Bras d’Or Lakes, Nova Scotia, Canada 10–500 m Mud, sand, gravel, and boulders Trawl doors left parallel marks (furrows and berms), fainter marks from footgear, primarily in mud.   Sidescan sonar survey after area was closed to mobile gear for 1 yr.
2 Engel and Kvitek 1998 California, USA 180 m Gravel, sand, silt, and clay S fewer rocks and biogenic mounds, S less flocculent material, and S more exposed sediment and shell fragments in HF area; lower densities of large epibenthic taxa in HF area (S for sea pens, starfish, anemones, and sea slugs); higher densities of nematodes, oligochaetes, brittle stars and one species of polychaete in HF area; no differences between areas for crustaceans, mollusks, or nemerteans.   Used a submersible and grab samples (3 yr) to compare lightly trawled and heavily trawled commercial fishing sites with same sediments and depth.
3 Smith et al. 1985 Long Island Sound, New York, USA Not given Sand and mud Tracks in sediment (<5 cm in sand, 5-15 cm in mud); attraction of predators; suspension of epibenthic organisms. Tracks "naturalized" by tidal currents. Video and diver observations.

www.nefsc.noaa.gov
Search
Link Disclaimer
webMASTER
Privacy Policy
(Modified Jun. 13 2008)