CRD 01-16

APPENDIX 5

ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT REPRODUCTIVE DATA
FOR THE WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC RIGHT WHALE

T.R. Frasier,* M.W. Brown,** S.D. Kraus,*** and B.N. White*

* Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada

** Center For Coastal Studies, PO Box 1036, Provincetown, MA 02657, USA and
East Coast Ecosystems, PO Box 36, Freeport, Nova Scotia, B0V 1B0, Canada

*** New England Aquarium, Central Wharf, Boston, MA 02110, USA


Since 1980, the birth of a total of 221 right whale calves has been documented in the western North Atlantic. Of these, seven are known to have died and 54 were not photographically identified (Table 1). An analysis of sighting data shows that 57% of the calves were brought to the Bay of Fundy by their mothers (Fundy calves, Table 1) and 43% were not taken to the Bay of Fundy (Non-Fundy calves, Table 1). The mothers of non-Fundy calves use a yet unknown summering and nursery location (Malik et al, 1999). Since 1987, genetic analyses have been used to assess population structure and reproduction in the North Atlantic right whale. Eighty-five mother-calf pairs have been sampled and genetically analyzed (Total genotyped, Table 2). These 85 pairs comprise 52% of the total mother-calf pairs for which the calf was photo-identified (Table 2). Of the mother-calf pairs that have been sampled, 60.0% of those seen in the Bay of Fundy have been sampled, and 32.5% of those not seen in the Bay of Fundy have been sampled (Table 3). Genetic analyses of these samples, using both mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and nuclear DNA, have shown that there is significant population substructuring between calves that are brought to the Bay of Fundy and calves that are not brought to the Bay of Fundy in their first year by their mothers (Malik et al, 1999, Waldick 1999). This substructuring is the result of site fidelity to a specific summer habitat area on the part of right whale mothers. They bring their calves either to the Bay of Fundy (Fundy calves) or to an unknown summer area (Non-Fundy calves). Offspring tend to show the same site fidelity as their mothers. This pattern of differential habitat use means that some lineages use the Bay of Fundy in summer and others use an unknown area. Genetic studies show that there is also a degree of reproductive isolation between these two groups, suggesting that they could be using different mating areas and that they are therefore more distinct than previously thought (Waldick 1999).

The population substructuring described above is of increasing interest when considering reproduction over the past three years, during which time no mothers from the Fundy subgroup have produced offspring (Table 1, plus data from the calving season of 2000; Phil Hamilton, pers. comm.). This skew in reproductive performance could indicate that there are recent and crucial differences in other aspects of the two subgroups, such as habitat quality and mortality due to anthropogenic factors. Such differences between subpopulations within the North Atlantic right whale population should be of primary consideration in all future studies of this population as conservation efforts are often futile when population structure is not taken into account (Taylor and Dizon 1999).


References

Malik, S., M.W. Brown, S.D. Kraus, A.R. Knowlton, P.K. Hamilton, and B.N. White. 1999. Assessment of mitochondrial DNA structuring and nursery use in the North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis). Can. J. Zool. 77:1-6.

Taylor, B.L. and A.E. Dizon. 1999. First policy then science: why a management unit based solely on genetic criteria cannot work. Molecular Ecology 8: S11-S16.

Waldick, R.C. 1999. Assessing the status of the endangered North Atlantic right whale using genetic and demographic data. Ph.D. thesis, McMaster University. 172 pp.

Table 1: Numbers of right whale calves photographed from Fundy and non-Fundy population. $=calves which did not die in the calving ground. *Calves for which photos are inadequate to permit individual identification.

Year

Calves born

Calves alive$
Fundy calves
Non-Fundy
Unknown calves*

1980

5

5

3

2

3

1981

8

8

7

1

0

1982

12

11

6

5

2

1983

9

9

4

5

2

1984

12

12

11

1

1

1985

11

11

5

6

3

1986

13

13

6

7

2

1987

11

11

7

4

0

1988

8

7

4

3

0

1989

19

16

11

5

1

1990

12

12

9

3

2

1991

17

17

9

8

5

1992

12

12

4

8

4

1993

8

6

4

2

1

1994

8

8

3

5

3

1995

7

7

3

4

4

1996

21

21

14

7

7

1997

19

19

11

8

7

1998

5

5

0

5

3

1999

4

4

0

4

4

Total
221

214

121

93

54

Table 2: Genotyped mother-calf pairs from Fundy and non-Fundy populations

Year

Possible Pairs*

Total Genotyped

Fundy

Non-Fundy

1980

2

0

0

0

1981

8

3

3

0

1982

9

4

2

2

1983

7

2

2

0

1984

11

6

6

0

1985

8

2

1

0

1986

11

5

3

2

1987

11

6

5

1

1988

7

3

3

0

1989

15

11

9

2

1990

10

4

4

0

1991

12

8

8

0

1992

8

7

4

3

1993

5

3

3

0

1994

5

2

1

1

1995

3

2

2

0

1996

14

9

9

0

1997

12

7

7

0

1998

2

2

0

2

1999

0

0

0

0

Total

160

86

72

13

Table 3: Percentage of genotyped cow-calf pairs from Fundy and non-Fundy population

Year

Identified Fundy

Genotyped Fundy

%-Fundy

Identified Non-Fundy

Genotyped Non-Fundy

%-Non-Fundy

1980

2

0

N/A

0

0

N/A

1981

7

3

42.8571

1

0

N/A

1982

6

2

33.3333

3

2

66.66667

1983

4

2

50

3

0

N/A

1984

11

6

54.5455

0

0

N/A

1985

5

1

20

3

0

N/A

1986

6

3

50

5

2

40

1987

7

5

71.4286

4

1

25

1988

4

3

75

3

0

N/A

1989

11

9

81.8182

4

2

50

1990

9

4

44.4444

1

0

N/A

1991

9

8

88.8889

3

0

N/A

1992

4

4

100

4

3

75

1993

4

3

75

1

0

N/A

1994

3

1

33.3333

2

1

50

1995

3

2

66.6667

0

0

N/A

1996

14

9

64.2857

0

0

N/A

1997

11

7

63.6364

1

0

N/A

1998

0

0

N/A

2

2

100

1999

0

0

N/A

0

0

N/A

Total
120

72

60

40

13

32.5

www.nefsc.noaa.gov
Search
Link Disclaimer
webMASTER
Privacy Policy
(Modified Jun. 13 2008)