
Current and Alternative Boston Traffic Separation Scheme (TSS) and associated
right whale sightings, March-July 1960-2003. Figure from Wiley,
D., M. Thompson and R. Merrick. 2005. An analysis to reduce ship
strike risk to baleen whales in the Stellwagen Bank National Marine
Sanctuary. Report to the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary.
175 Edward Foster Road, Scituate, MA. Click image (above) for enlarged
view. |

Northern right whales underway off New England in May, 2002. Photo
by NEFSC aerial survey team, MMPA permit 775-1600-02. |

Richard Merrick of the
NEFSC explains his findings at the Marine Mammal Commission
review panel (see related story.) Photo by J. Hain, Associated
Scientists at Woods Hole |

“For
marine mammals the pattern seems to be that if you remove
human-caused stresses and then wait, you will get recovery.
First the populations have to work through whatever problems
have likely been caused by humans.”

From
the left: Southern fur seal, photo by Richard Behn NOAA
Corps; gray whale breaching, photo by Dave Withrow NOAA/NMFS/NMML;
and elephant seal pups, photo by Rolf Ream, NOAA/NMFS/NMML |
Merrick
gave three examples of species that fit the pattern. The Eastern
Pacific gray whale population was down to a couple of hundred
animals before hunting was stopped. After the hunting ban,
the population didn’t immediately start growing. “Then
some fortuitous combination of events got them started and
they just chugged along,” said Merrick. Today the group
is no longer listed as either threatened or endangered. Two
other examples are elephant
seals and southern
fur seals -- which were hunted to what people thought was
extinction. Both populations have recovered, but it took time.
Northern
right whales are an example of a species that hasn’t
yet turned that corner. In general, Merrick is optimistic about
the chances of recovering these whales, which are among the
nation’s most endangered wildlife species. He cautions
however, that it will be a long haul.
“We
stopped hunting them but there’s been no recovery during
the past century,” Merrick observed. “This historical
lack of recovery is perhaps not caused by collisions or entanglement,
but removing those threats -- and the resulting loss of animals
-- can only improve recovery chances.” |
by Teri L. Frady
Richard Merrick, chief of the NEFSC
Protected Species Branch, has shown that moving a portion of the Boston
ship traffic lanes slightly to the north could reduce by half or more
the relative risk of collisions between ships using the lanes and large
whales.
“This
study looked not only at separating whales from ships, but also at whether there should be changes to where and when fishing
gear modifications are currently required to reduce the risks to
these animals,” said Merrick.
The endangered Northern right whale
is particularly susceptible to ship collisions. All six species of
endangered whales that occur off the Northeast are known to be injured
or killed by both ship collisions and encounters with some kinds of
fishing gear.
NOAA Fisheries Service
has identified large areas off the Northeast where right whales aggregate
during the year. Since the late 1990s, fishing gear modified to make
it easier for whales to escape entanglements must be used in these
areas. “The
strategy relies on seasonal management. To make that work, you need
to define in both time and space where whales are,” said Merrick.
Since Merrick’s
group began developing a systematic approach for defining these areas,
NOAA Fisheries Service has also initiated a national
strategy for managing ship traffic along the east coast to
reduce the chances of ship collisions with large whales. Merrick
was particularly interested in whether areas for “whale safer” ship
operations off New England could be similar, or even the same, as
the areas where “whale-safer” fishing gear is required.
As it turns out the answer is probably yes.
The basis for this conclusion
(as well as the one supporting a shift in the Boston ship traffic
separation scheme) relies on a clearer picture of when and where
the whales can be expected to aggregate and persist during the year.
Think about it.
There are just 300-350 individuals in the population, and they don’t all travel
together. Over the year, they range from the Bay of Fundy and the
waters southeast of Nova Scotia to the warm southern Atlantic waters
off Florida. The task would be almost impossible if the animals didn’t
come together in larger groups to take advantage of concentrations
of their primary food, and for mating, giving birth, and nursing
young.
“The springtime feeding
in Cape Cod Bay, the early summer feeding in the Great South Channel,
and the summer feeding areas in the Canadian Bay of Fundy have been
well-documented for some time,” said Merrick. “But only
in recent years have we been able to learn more about whale presence
other times of the year, and in places besides these better known
ones.”
The big step up
in understanding right whale distribution off the Northeastern U.S.
has been achieved through NOAA’s expansion of aerial
sighting surveys over the entire Gulf of Maine. Merrick’s
study used data from more than 10,000 right whale sighting events
(an event could include multiple animals) reported between 1960 and
2003. About one quarter of these (2,396) occurred between 1999 and
2003, and were made by NOAA’s aerial survey team.
“The data are much improved
since 2000,” said Merrick. “Through our systematic aerial
survey, now conducted year-round, we are getting a much better idea
of what’s going on offshore, away from the nearshore places
where groups are more easily sighted.” For example, prior to
2000 there was little data suggesting that the northern edge of George
Bank was an area where there would be animals. “Now we know
that they are there,” said Merrick.
The aerial team
is watching primarily, but not exclusively, for right whales. “When we see right whales,
we break off the survey track and photograph them,” Merrick
explained. “Otherwise, the track lines are the same as they
would be for any other transect survey. Overall, we are trying to
survey the entire Gulf of Maine on a monthly basis.”
Merrick’s results, along
with a companion study by colleagues at NOAA’s Stellwagen Bank
National Marine Sanctuary, will be considered by the agency as it
finalizes proposals for reducing the chances of collisions between
ships and whales along the east coast. Merrick’s work also
suggests that the boundary between two seasonal management areas
should be skewed slightly to the northeast on Georges Bank.
"It is hard for
us to know what the real rate of interaction is between gear and
animals, or between ships and animals, because the events themselves
are relatively rare in comparison to the enormous amount of activity
that’s out
there,” said Merrick. “So usually we are looking at reducing
relative, not absolute risk and this is one example of how we might
be able to do that.”
Posted
April 26, 2006 |