Hallway Poll #3: Cat Killing
for Conservation Okay?
Robben
Island is
best known to most of us as the place where Nelson
Mandela spent most of his time in prison.
It's come up in world stature since 1998, when it was added
to UNESCO's list of World
Heritage Sites. But oh, the burdens of such
accolades. The site now needs a wildlife conservation plan
as part of the deal, as the island's rich wildlife population
is one of its biggest assets. Site managers say stamping
out feral cats, thought to be descendants
of prison pets, is key to protecting the island's endangered
birds, and 7,000 breeding pairs of African
penguins. The Society for Prevention of Cruelty
to Animals says the ongoing eradication of the estimated
70 cats by sniper fire is inhumane and ought to be stopped.
They also say cats aren’t the only suspect in bird
deaths, naming tourists, the black mole snake, giant mice,
seals, and a theorized pack of flesh-eating bunnies as
other possible culprits. Said bird expert Les
Underhill of the University
of Cape Town, "It's such a stupid idea
that it's embarrassing. It's not the rabbits who are responsible.
It's the cats." Counters SPCA chief Allen Perrins, "...
we have a duty to ensure the welfare of the cats and, for
that matter, all animals - wild and domestic, indigenous
and exotic." He supports an ongoing trap-and-sterilize
program that has so far yielded just eight candidates.
Is taking off the
gloves (or the safety, as the case may be) for conservation
on Robben Island the wrong choice?